Residents Parking Permits
I believe that the local authority have acted in an unfair, underhand and dis-proportionate manner in setting the new fee's for residents parking permits. Some residents will go from paying nothing to a possible £70+ in the first year and exsisting permit holders will see a possible 200% increase. Most of this has been implemented without consultation and is based on flawed and inaccurate assumptions by the council.
Comments
We have a junction at one end of our estate where we cannot drive into our homes before 10am each weekday morning; a very sore point. It was originally set up to stop rat running while the underpass was constructed on the A13 many years ago; obviously not the same situation any more but they won't bring the times forward.
Anyway before Christmas the bollards stopped working so cars were coming through and being caught on camera which was set up to monitor a bus lane. Thing is every sign up informing that you can't do this before 10am is on the wrong side of the road, possibly deliberately and there is no sign at the entrance, where there always used to be before Tfl ruined this whole road, plus there is no warning that CCTV covers the junction, which I believe is a legal requirement.
Under FOI I requested to know how much the council had raked in since January this year until late June: an astonishing £78,000+. Not a bad little earner for not putting the right signs in the right places.
Of course anyone who fought the PCNs won the case because it was all a farce but unfortunately most people will just pay up in case the fine goes up.
Same with parking zones; the council are trying to enforce them where they are definitely not required. It comes down to the few of us to fight and rally the neighbours against these preposterous proposals.
I suppose that we should be grateful that the new scratch cards for visitors has only doubled the price of their parking and that there is only one price for each vehicle!
Why have they not brought out a range of scratch cards which increase in cost proportional to the emmisions of the visitors car!
In relation to the scratch card v the old orange printed card;Even if the council did not have the ability or inclination to keep the printing in house they could, I'm sure, have secured a good and reasonable deal with some small,maybe struggling printer to produce these cards. Being once again synical perhaps that would have shown to much committment to supporting local business. Where do the scratch cards come from ?
Just a thought as your last message Ken made me laugh.
Why did you have to move if your neighbours were the subject of ASBO? If that is the case maybe its because you were the easy option to deal with?
As far as 'the right to protest' goes...... I would like to have the right to protest but I would far prefer not to have to use it !
Ours runs till 21:30 every night, why on earth does it have to be that late?
We dont have a problem with people wanting to park in our area there is nothing near by to warrent people wanting to park.
Im sure LBBD would say the reason we have no parking problems is because of the restrictions that are in place in place!
I'm sure if enough people complained the situation could be reversed; I believe it did happen in one area in the borough but I'm not sure which one.
I have noticed this in some places but not all.
Again who decides what regulations are used where?
A good question. As to 'who decides what rgulations are used where ?' I can only assume that it is the mandarins within the town hall.
With regard to your common sense based suggestion for having an allowance for visitors/engineers this looks like another non-starter.
The coucil published cost for an essential workers permit is £150. I recently had a nurse call at my home to provide post operative care and she was concerned as she had not got a permit for a replacment car she had to use.
For Doctors the fee is £250 and for business permits it is £235 (on street only) WHY ?
How can you have the exclusive right to park outside your own house? When you go out in your car, you wouldn't be able to park outside someone else's house (as only they could) and no-one else would be able to park outside yours (as only you could).
What most would like is to be able to park quite close though.
You obviously miss the point. No one is asking or expecting the exclusive right to park outside their house. Read earlier comments ! Secondly Road Tax or Vehicle excise duty is a national government issue and the controversy over how funds, rasied by this tax/duty, are spent will continue at that level. The local issue which this thread initially and continues to relate to is of other concerns. If you have a vehicle, how much did your tax/duty increase as a percentage of the cost of the previous tax/duty ? You didn't paythe tax/duty to park, you bought it to comply with current government legislation and for the ability to DRIVE on the road or to leave it on a publid highway. Residents Parking Permits do not afford the holder the 'privilege' to use the highway.
Allowing or making it possible for someone to park outside (or near) their home entails preventing or deterring others from parking there. There's a cost involved in doing that and I see no reason why the cost shouldn't be borne by those who directly benefit from the service.
So the question is, does the VED that motorists already pay raise enough £ to cover the services it ought to cover . The answer seems to be "no"; according to the Instiute of Fiscal Studies:
“Road use generates costs which are borne by wider society instead of the motorist.” and “These ‘externalities’ mean that in the absence of taxation or pricing, there is an inefficiently high level of road use. Taxes can help bring private demands into line with the socially desirable level. Several different externalities are associated with motoring. Some, like carbon emissions from burning petrol and diesel, are easily addressed through fuel duties as the costs depend entirely on fuel use. Others, notably congestion but also the costs of noise and accidents, vary enormously according to where and when someone drives.”Source: http://ipayroadtax.com/
Some realised some didnt :-) Sorry for the confusion Colin
What I was getting at was why do people have to pay to park in their own road
You missed the point because up until your input no one was discussing VED/Road Fund Licence/Road fund licence. That is a separate yet worthwhile topic.
You also declined or failed to respond as to whether you have calculated the percentage increase in VED/RFL................
My opinion is that VED should be abolished and the tax shortfall made up by higher tax on fuel. This will encourage people to use less fuel. In rural areas where people have to drive further it will encourage the use of local amenties.
How can people in rural areas use what isn't there. Every village doesn't necessarily have a shop that stocks all they need.
I feel that your observations raise two separate but related issues.
I completely agree that it is unfair that having paid for a dropped kerb (cost about £800) that others park on thier own front gardens without forked out for this privilege. It is an offence, I'm not sure whether it is covered by Road Traffic legislation or is just a by-law, to drive across the pavement which is sometimes enforced by the LBBD.
I am aware of one instance where a neighbour of mine was quite rightly threatened with legal action by LBBD for doing just that.
In relation to concreting the whole of the garden I do not believe that there are any rules in relation to this unless of course it is covered by planning rules which would apply to both owner occupiers and tenants.
I'm sure that we will see more instances of parking within the bounds of the property without having a dropped kerb to avoid paying the new fees for residents parking permits
Unsuprisingly they state that is not an issue which falls within the complaints proceedure because it is a policy matter which is agreed by members.
Apparently 'Councillors were consulted and approved the price review for the borough as they support the need to reduce the Boroughs carbon emmissions.'
Most of the letter was dedicated to saying that it is a success policy used in other London boroughs and how they have frozen the Council tax for the fourth year......................... What a load of b******s.
What a joke! I swear they just make it up as they go along, perhaps we should ask the Govt. to move it!
I wonder how many vehicles either in the fleet or used by contractors to the LBBD are green. I take into account that the larger vehicles ie dustcarts can only be powered by high emission fuels. Bring back the horse andcart and the electric milk float !
Comments are closed. Why not start a new conversation?